EC Library Guide on fighting food fraud: Selected publications
A selection of EU publications
- Alert and Cooperation Network – 2022 annual report
European Commission: Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Alert and Cooperation Network – 2022 annual report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
This annual report covers all the information shared in 2022 within iRASFF, between members of the Alert and Cooperation Network (ACN) that includes the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed network (RASFF), the Administrative Assistance and Cooperation network (AAC) or the Agri-Food Fraud Network (FFN). 2022 shows an increase in the number of notifications shared in the AAC and FFN in comparison with previous years. This illustrates the continued commitment of Member States’ competent authorities to detect and report non-compliances, even if without health risk, or when suspected of fraudulent practice. In 2022, a high number of those notifications related to pesticide residues. The European Commission continued to assist Member States, through both expertise and IT support to facilitate the increasing exchange of information. Due follow-up was given to suspicious cross-border fraudulent activities, leading to launching specific actions such as the coordinated control plans on the illegal trade of pets, and to deter certain fraudulent practices in honey.
- Commission staff working document accompanying the document Report from the Commission on the overall operation of official controls performed in Member States (2021) to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plan
European Commission: Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Commission staff working document accompanying the document Report from the Commission on the overall operation of official controls performed in Member States (2021) to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
The Commission publishes an annual report on the operation of official controls in EU countries in the areas of food and feed safety, animal and plant health, animal welfare, pesticides, organic farming and quality schemes. For the purposes of this report, references to EU countries and the statistical data include the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland. This report is based on: the annual reports submitted by the national authorities on their official control activities; and the results of Commission controls carried out. The Commission’s report covers the year 2021. It provides a compilation of comparable data into EU-wide statistics. These data will, over time, allow trends in controls and non-compliance issues to be identified. This staff working document accompanies the Commission’s report and provides more details on the legal framework on official controls and Commission controls; and the controls and audits carried out by national authorities and by the Commission.
- EFSA consolidated annual activity report 2023
European Food Safety Authority, EFSA consolidated annual activity report 2023, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
The Annual Activity Report of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for 2023 provides a comprehensive overview of EFSA’s key activities, achievements and challenges in ensuring food safety in the EU and beyond.
- The EU agri-food fraud network and the administrative assistance and cooperation system: 2020 annual repor
European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. Publications Office, 2021.
This annual report does not measure the number of agri-food fraud incidents in the EU. It presents the EU Agri-Food Fraud Network activities, highlighting certain requests for cooperation and voluntary exchange of information between Member States themselves and with the Commission on suspected cases of agri-food fraud and provides some valuable examples of EU coordinated actions.
- EU coordinated action to deter certain fraudulent practices in the honey sector: Analytical testing results of imported honey
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ždiniaková, T., Lörchner, C., De Rudder, O.et al. Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
In the frame of the EU coordinated action 15 EU Member States (BE, BG, CZ, DE, DK, EL, ES, FR, HU, IE, IT, LT, PL, RO, SE) plus CH and NO randomly sampled 320 honey consignments originating from 20 exporting countries, which were sent to JRC for analysis to detect the presence of exogenous sugar syrup in honey. Several methods (EA/LC-IRMS, HPAEC-PAD, 1H-NMR) were used by the JRC to detect markers indicative for the presence of exogenous sugar syrups. Of the 320 samples received from the competent authorities of the participating countries, 147 (46 %) were suspicious of being non-compliant with the provisions of the EU Honey Directive 2001/110/EC.
The suspicion rate was considerably high in comparison to an earlier EU-wide coordinated control plan conducted in 2015-17, where 14 % of the analysed samples did not comply with established benchmark criteria to assess honey authenticity. However, a different set of methods with improved detection capability was used in the present study, which may explain this difference. Stable carbon isotope ratio analysis by EA-IRMS (AOAC method 991.41), a method that has frequently been used in the past to detect sugar syrups made of maize starch or sugarcane, was not effective in detecting honey suspicious of being adulterated. This is a clear indication that such sugar syrups are no longer used to extend honey and have been replaced by syrups made mostly from rice, wheat or sugar beet. The highest absolute number of suspicious consignments originated from China (66 out of 89, 74 %), although honey originating from Turkey (14 out of 15, 93 %) had the highest relative proportion of suspicious samples. Honey imported from the United Kingdom had an even higher suspicion rate (10 out of 10, 100 %). However, the available traceability information suggests that this could be the result of honey produced in other countries and further processed in the United Kingdom before its re-export to the EU. Although a substantially high number of honey consignments imported into the internal market was tested, the obtained results represent the situation during the sampling period (10/2021 to 02/2022) and shall not be generalised or extrapolated to other situations.
- Fighting fraudulent and deceptive practices in the agri-food chain – Technical report implementation of Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Winkler, B., Maquet, A., Reeves-Way, E.et al. Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
This Technical Report presents challenges, opportunities and good practice examples in relation to the implementation of Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625. Competent authorities of the Member States are required to not only detect violations of the rules governing the agri-food chain but also to identify possible intentional violations of those rules, perpetrated through fraudulent or deceptive practices by operators for the purpose of gaining an undue advantage. The purpose of this technical report therefore is to promote the uniform interpretation and application of the provisions of Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625.
- Fighting fraudulent practices in the agri-food chain – Overview report
European Commission: Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Fighting fraudulent practices in the agri-food chain – Overview report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
This Commission overview report outlines how Member States fight fraud along the agri-food chain. Fraud in the agri-food chain affects industry and consumers economically, undermines consumer trust and may lead to serious health issues. The EU has recognised the importance of tackling fraudulent and deceptive practices in the agri-food chain and since 2019 Member States are required to carry out risk-based controls to detect fraudulent and deceptive practices. The Commission carried out a project between 2020 and 2022 to collect information on the new arrangements put in place by Member States to fight fraud in the agri-food chain.
Based on this project, the Commission has published an overview report which focuses on eight Member States and how their competent authorities developed control arrangements and strategies to combat fraudulent practices. It presents the challenges, opportunities, and several good practice examples in relation to fraud related controls in the Member States. Furthermore, the Commission published in March 2023 a guidance document to support Member States in their efforts to combat fraud within the agri-food supply chain. It is particularly helpful, as it clearly outlines how to uniformly interpret and apply the respective EU laws in the context of fighting food fraud. The guidance document has been published on the following website: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC131525
- Food fraud summary
European Commission, Knowledge Centre for Food Fraud and Quality.
Monthly summary of articles on food fraud and adulteration.
- Food safety: Audit reports
European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, 2023-
Search and view Audit reports produced by the department.
- Implementation of official controls on animal by-products and derived products – Overview report
European Commission: Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Implementation of official controls on animal by-products and derived products – Overview report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
Animal by-products (ABP), while not suitable for human consumption, are converted into products that are brought to good use in many areas important for our daily lives. These include hides used to produce leather, fats used to produce biodiesel, or proteins, fats and microelements used for feeding animals, for the manufacture of medical devices, cosmetics and substrates for the pharmaceutical industry. What all of these uses have in common is the requirement for quality and safety of the products derived from ABP and the need for effective oversight of ABP operators by the responsible competent authorities. A new overview report from the European Commission has looked at the situation in the EU. It has found that inspections and checks carried out by the competent authorities (official controls) along the production chain of ABP and the products derived are generally implemented well. Nevertheless, the complexity of certain technical and engineering aspects of operators’ activities are challenging for competent authorities to check, requiring specialist knowledge to be effective. The EU Member States are working hard to address these challenges.
- An information-based risk analysis IT tool protecting the European food system(s)
European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Bocchino, A., Ulberth, F. and Siligato, R., An information-based risk analysis IT tool protecting the European food system(s), Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
The Farm to Fork Strategy has recognised the necessity of intensifying efforts to combat fraudulent practices within the agri-food chain while simultaneously enhancing traceability and alert systems to improve coordination in addressing food fraud. A substantial volume of food chain data is already accessible at European and international levels, enabling a shift towards a digital, risk-based approach to safeguarding the food system. Nevertheless, this data is dispersed across various food businesses, competent authorities in Member States, and Commission services, and data sets are not always interoperable.
The European Commission could harness its in-house resources, as existing databases, intelligence sources, and digital tools, to aggregate relevant food chain information. This aggregation can enhance descriptive analytics for visualizing current food safety and fraud issues, diagnostic analytics for identifying potential underlying causes, and predictive analytics for more effectively targeting risk-based official controls. The report recommends incentivising food integrity data sharing among Member States’ competent authorities and the European Commission, creating a public-private partnership for transitioning the supply chain to digital traceability, and developing an AI-driven predictive analytics system to support targeting control activities to supply chains where fraud is most likely. It also proposes a project to assess supply chain vulnerabilities.
- Report from the Commission on the overall operation of official controls carried out in Member States (2021) to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products
European Commission: Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, Report from the Commission on the overall operation of official controls carried out in Member States (2021) to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
This report covers the overall operation of EU countries’ official controls and the Commission’s control activities in 2021. These controls aim to ensure a high level of health protection and trust in the food chain, from farm to fork. They are an important way to verify that businesses are complying with their legal requirements so that EU consumers can be confident that the food they eat is safe. They are also key to enabling the smooth operation of safe trade in food, animals and plants, both within the EU and with non-EU countries. National authorities are responsible for carrying out official controls. If businesses along the food chain do not comply with the relevant legislation, the national authorities are required to enforce the requirements, ensuring that businesses meet their obligations.
In 2021, there were 16.9 million entities within the scope of official controls and national authorities carried out nearly 5 million official controls on them. Based on these controls, around 1 million non-compliance issues were identified, leading to the application of nearly 500 000 administrative sanctions and almost 8 000 judicial actions. The Commission verifies the EU countries’ implementation of official controls and enforcement activities. The reports from these Commission controls, which are published on the Commission's website, provide a clear picture of national authorities’ performance and are a significant part of the review process that ensures that EU legislation is fit for purpose.
- Results of an EU wide coordinated control plan to establish the prevalence of fraudulent practices in the marketing of herbs and spices
European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Publications Office of the European Union, 2021.
Culinary herbs and spices are valued for flavouring food and could also provide other beneficial properties, such as antioxidative and bacteriostatic effects as well as certain pharmacological activities. Their supply chain is complex, long, and globalised. Europe is one of the world’s leading importing regions for herbs and spices, importing approximately 300.000 tons, mostly spices from East Asia. Most of the spices are produced in countries where certain post-harvest processes such as drying and cleaning may happen before being shipped to the importing country where they are further cleaned and sanitised before being packaged and distributed either to other food businesses or for retail consumption.
At each stage, fraudulent manipulations may happen and the more often the material is transferred from one operator to the next, the fraud opportunity increases. Information available to the European Commission indicates that adulterated herbs and spices are present on the EU market but remain undetected. Therefore, the European Commission set up a coordinated control plan inviting the EU member states to sample certain herbs and spices and send them for analysis to the Joint Research Centre. The main objective of the plan was to establish the prevalence on the market of some non-compliances and of some possible illegal practices into marketing of herbs and spices. Twenty-one EU member states plus Norway and Switzerland submitted nearly 1900 samples to JRC for analysis. The majority of samples was ground or crushed. The co-ordinated control plan encompassed cumin, curcuma (turmeric), oregano, paprika/chilli, pepper, and saffron, as those were frequently reported to be the target of manipulations. Nearly 10.000 analyses were carried out on 1885 samples using a range of state-of-the-art analytical techniques to assess the purity of the samples (‘true to the name’). The EU coordinated control plan is until now the largest investigation into the authenticity of culinary herbs and spices in terms of participating countries and number of analyses. The overall rate of suspicious samples was 17% (323 of a total of 1885 analysed samples), which is less than what was previously reported in the scientific literature or by national food control institutions. The oregano supply chain was most vulnerable as 48% of samples were suspicious of being adulterated, in most cases with olive leaves. The percentage of samples which were suspicious of adulteration were 17% for pepper, 14% for cumin, 11% for curcuma, and 11% for saffron. The lowest suspicion rate (6%) was found for paprika/chilli. The majority of suspicious samples contained non-declared plant material; in 2% of the analysed spice samples non-authorised dyes were detected. One sample contained a high level of lead chromate. No specific trend regarding the rate of potential fraudulent manipulations along the supply chain (country of origin/importers/wholesalers/processors/packagers) could be observed. However, the number of samples obtained at certain stages (domestic production, local markets, border control, and internet) was too low to enable statistically meaningful comparisons.
- Study on a future-proofing analysis of the 2017 AMR action plan: Final report
European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
This preliminary outcome assessment and future-proofing study of the 2017 European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) identifies priorities to inform improvements that can make the EU AMR Action Plan fit for the future. The study found that developments across One Health dimensions of AMR - including human health, animal health, and the environment - are likely to continue to be influential in the future.
The EU AMR Action Plan objectives remain relevant and coherent, but there are issues that the Action Plan is not sufficiently addressing or is not equipped to handle. EU AMR Action Plan activities have mostly achieved their objectives and significant progress has been made under each of the Action Plan’s three pillars. However, gaps and limitations were identified, related to the design of the Action Plan itself and the One Health approach, e.g., differences between countries; cross-country coordination and collaboration; available information related to AMR and other external factors. Four areas were identified in which to strengthen the EU AMR Action Plan now and for the future: achieving a fully-integrated One Health approach; knowledge translation and innovation; addressing cross-country differences; and responding movement of people and climate change. A set of recommendations are proposed.
- Last Updated: Feb 3, 2025 11:25 AM
- URL: https://ec-europa-eu.libguides.com/fighting-food-fraud
- Print Page